What No One Ever Discusses: The Reproductive Effects of Wireless Radiation
The teratogenicity of wireless radiation —that is, its proclicity to cause structural or functional defects in a developing fetus— is a subject unknown to most North Americans who have suffered decades of pro-wireless brainwashing. Despite massive scientific research and much available information on the many ways this radiation can impair pregnancy and damage a fetus, the mainstream media and medical establishments provide zero warning for women of childbearing age about the horrific reproductive risks of microwave and millimeter wave radiation. One rigorous DNA study
reported that 39.75% of cells in peripheral blood of cell phone users had DNA damage, highly significant compared to control subjects. [1] Hundreds of other published and peer-reviewed reports clearly show
that RF/microwave radiation efficiently rips apart human DNA and
therefore modifies its chromosomes and genes, fundamental genetic
material. Wi-irradiated
populations can be referred to as
GMOs (genetically modified organisms). This would certainly apply to
Wi-irradiated unborn babies who sustain enough wireless genetic damage to become
"special needs" children. Radiation that quickly obliterates DNA is capable
of causing: miscarriage, embryo growth retardation, premature birth and
low birth weight (a major problem in USA), cognitive dysfunction,
delayed development in infants, plus many kinds of birth defects. [2] ♦ The fragile ova cells in female ovaries are highly susceptible to damage from microwave radiation.[3]
♦ Microwave
currents flowing through a pregnant woman deeply infiltrate uterine amniotic
fluids. [4]
♦ Especially
vulnerable to wireless radiation are fetal stem cells
which cannot adjust to microwave abuse, nor can they repair damage to
their DNA. Recent data suggests that epigenetic mutations (caused by environmental damage) in stem cells
have a connection to the development of human cancers. [5]
♦ Fetuses exposed to any kind of radiation capable of damaging DNA have a highly increased risk of later developing cancer, [6] the number one disease killer of children in the U.S.
Yet, millions of young American parents remain willfully ignorant about a pernicious, mechanical energy force that
has life-and-death ramifications for their offspring. Perverse is a
generation that believes wireless pleasuring is more important than the
health and safety of unborn babies. Reproductive Effects of the Megahertz and Gigahertz Frequency Bands Used for Wi-Fi and Bluetooth Technologies A 2009 report by the Center for Reproductive
Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, Ohio, is loaded with
references to global scientific studies confirming that RF/microwave
radiation --across the spectrum-- is a multi-faceted hazard for both male and
female reproduction. [7] The Wi-Fi/Bluetooth frequency band of 2.45 gigahertz punishes living flesh with 2.45 billion polarity oscillations per second. If 2.45 billion hertz inflicts the reproductive carnage described below, is anyone curious about the disaster potential of the hyper-powerful frequencies now employed by beam-forming 4G and 5G technologies? What portends the new 5G millimeter wave frequencies (30 to 100 billion hertz) blazing through testicles, ovaries and fetuses? Below a sample of the many warning studies available for people who want healthy children.
♦ In 1997, a meta-study by epidemiologist Dr. John R. Goldstein of Ben-Gurion University, Israel, confirmed that numerous human studies on microwave exposure have shown negative reproductive outcomes, including spontaneous abortion (miscarriage). This study cited a 1993 study of miscarriages among female physiotherapists occupationally exposed (diathermy equipment) to 915 megahertz and 2.45 gigahertz microwave radiation (at power densities within current FCC exposure guidelines): "Of the microwave-exposed women, 47.7% had miscarriages prior to the 7th week of pregnancy compared to 14.5% of non-exposed women." [8]
♦ In 2000, researchers reported that 2.45 gigahertz radiation produced uteroplacental circulatory disturbances and ovarian and placental
dysfunction during rodent pregnancy: "These results suggest that microwaves...produce uteroplacental circulatory disturbances and ovarian and placental dysfunction during pregnancy, probably through nonthermal actions. The uteroplacental disturbances appear to be due to actions of PGF (2) alpha and may pose some risk for pregnancy." [9]
♦ In 2004, a technical publication produced by Associated Bioelectromagnetics Technologists warned that pregnant women should avoid microwave radiation because the fetus may not be fully protected by amniotic fluid due to natural movements of both mother and child. The report noted that the female pelvic structure promotes deep RF radiation penetration which can be absorbed by the developing fetus. [10]
♦
In 2013, medical researchers in India studied the effects of gigahertz radiation on female mice to ascertain effects on sperm
implantation and pregnancy. They concluded:
"Our findings led us to conclude that a low level of MW [microwave]
irradiation-induced oxidative stress not only suppresses implantation,
but may also lead to deformity of the embryo in case pregnancy continues.
We also suggest
that MW [microwave] radiation-induced oxidative stress, by increasing ROS production
in the body, may lead to DNA strand breakage in the brain cells and
implantation failure/resorption or abnormal pregnancy in mice." [11] ♦ In
2013, Greek scientists published results of 280 microwave experiments
on the drosophila fly, which is considered suitable for studies on human reproduction and fertility. Both Wi-Fi and Bluetooth
radiation propagated at 2.45 gigahertz produced significant negative effects on drosophila
fertility. Bluetooth radiation used in this experiment was shown to induce cell death, even at low intensity levels (0.3
volts/meter), which is a power density hundreds of times lower than international microwave exposure
guidelines allow for human exposure). [12] ♦ In 2014, scientists published a study on the effects of 2.45 gigahertz on female rats in the uterus and on newborn female rats, compared to non-irradiated controls. The exposure duration was only one hour per day. The prenatal and postnatal
irradiated newborns showed severe stress to brain and ovary tissues. They
also suffered growth restriction and delayed puberty, especially those
irradiated within the uterus. [13] What does this mean for pregnant humans who live/work in Wi-Fi radiation for many hours per day?
♦ A
2010 collaborative study by reproductive scientists in Argentina and
USA exposed human sperm to four hours of Wi-Fi radiation from a laptop
connected to the Internet. The study concludes: "Ex-vivo exposure of human spermatozoa [determined as mostly normal] to
a wireless Internet-connected laptop decreased motility and increased
DNA fragmentation by a non-thermal effect. We speculate that keeping a
laptop connected wirelessly to the Internet on the lap near the testis
may result in decreased male fertility." [14] ♦ In 2010, scientists in India irradiated male rats with 50 gigahertz radiation (this is a millimeter wave frequency for SuperGig Wi-Fi and 5G technologies): "We conclude that these radiations may have a significant effect on [the] reproductive system of male rats, which may be an indication of male infertility." [15] ♦ In 2012, Turkish medical researchers exposed rats to 2.45 gigahertz for 60 minutes a day for 30 days: "In conclusion, wireless (2.45 gigahertz) EMR caused oxidative damage in testis by increasing the levels of lipid peroxidation and decreasing vitamin A and E levels." [16] ♦ In 2012, another group of Turkish researchers conducted a study on male rats exposed to 2.43 gigahertz microwaves 24 hours per day for 20 weeks. The exposed rats showed abnormal enzymes and significant evidence of chemical abnormalities and DNA damage in testis tissues. These changes were not found in the non-exposed control rats. The researchers concluded: "These findings raise questions about the safety of radiofrequency exposure from Wi-Fi Internet access devices for growing organisms of reproductive age, with a potential effect on both fertility and the integrity of germ cells [sperm and ova]." [17]
♦ In 2014, researchers exposed male rats to Wi-Fi radiation for two hours per day for 30 days. The exposed group had damaged sperm, free radical activity plus tissue damage in seminiferous tissues where sperm is formed. Researchers concluded that "chronic exposure to non-ionizing MW radiation may lead to infertility via free radical species-mediated pathway." [18]
♦ Another 2014 study exposed male rats to Wi-Fi type signals continuously for one year. The irradiated group not only had damaged sperm, but the testicular anatomy of these rats showed damage and inflammation, inspiring the researchers to advise: "We suggest Wi-Fi users avoid long-term exposure of RF emissions from Wi-Fi equipment." [19]
Some types of tissues absorb microwaves more efficiently than others. Eyes and breasts, ovaries and testicles absorb microwave radiation more readily than other external parts of the body. [20] Numerous
medical studies warn men to keep wireless devices —transmitting or on standby— away from the genitals and the pelvic area since sperm develops in the testicles. Many of these studies confirm that sperm can be badly damaged by wireless devices carried in pockets. In 2012, the Environmental Working Group confirmed that men who keep transmitting phones in a pocket or on a belt while using a Bluetooth ear piece have lower sperm count and poorer sperm quality than those who do not. [21] Studies on testicle absorption of microwave radiation showed that absorption by the right testicle of a man carrying a cell phone in his right trouser pocket can exceed two watts per kilogram, an exposure that exceeds FCC exposure guidelines. [22]
Damaged human sperm cells are a sorry sight. Studies show that Wi-irradiated sperm cells develop conspicuous abnormalities in behavior and appearance, like those seen in the pictures below. Dr. David
Carpenter of Harvard University, a physician who has worked in public health for two decades, says
there is convincing and consistent evidence that RF/microwave radiation
exposure over time increases the risk of cancer: "The
evidence to date shows clearly that men that have cell phones in their
pocket or on their belt, leaving it on for long periods of time, suffer
reduced sperm counts. [23] Notes 1. Ghandi, G. "Genetic Damage in Mobile Phone Users: Some Preliminary Findings," Indian J Hum Genetics, 2005, 11:99-104.
2. “Generation X-ray: Child Victims of Technological Abuse," Idaho Observer,
Jan/Feb 2009. This paper documents the horrific known effects
of Wi-radiation on children and human reproduction. In June 2012, the EMF Safety
Network published a bibliography of 312 studies documenting the wide
array of effects of electromagnetic fields on mammalian fertility and
reproduction. 3. "Effect of Non-ionizing Electromagnetic Field on the Alteration of Ovarian Follicles in Rats," Ahmadi et al., National Library of Medicine, 8(3):2168–2174, March 25, 2016. AI Overview says: "According to research, exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) and microwaves can potentially harm human ova cells by causing
changes in follicular development, increased oocyte DNA damage,
apoptosis (programmed cell death) within the ovary, and disruption of
the normal cell cycle, potentially leading to decreased fertility and
impacting the quality of eggs; however, more research is needed to fully understand the exact mechanisms and long-term effects on human reproduction."
4. From the newsletter of the Associated BioElectromagnetics Technologists of April 2004: “The
cell phone headset has become popular as a way to reduce the cognitive
impairment and cancer risk associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation
exposure. However, the possibility of embryonic and fetal damage is now
increasing as the radiating cell phone units are being moved elsewhere
on or near the body. In many cases the devices are relocated immediately
adjacent to the area where an embryo or fetus is carried. Researchers
have emphatically reported that an embryo/fetus should not be exposed to
radiofrequency radiation, such as that emitted by the portable cell
phone or portable telephone. One particular reason to avoid RF
radiation exposure during pregnancy is that an embryo/fetus may not be
fully protected by amniotic fluid for extended periods of time due to
the natural movement of the mother or the embryo/fetus within the womb.
Secondly, the pelvic structure promotes deep RF radiation penetration
and that radiation can be absorbed within the developing embryo/fetus.”
5. "Risk Assessment of Chronic
Exposures to Non-Thermal Microwaves from Mobile Communication," Igor
Belyaev, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 05-13-2014. This paper discusses stem cell effects of microwaves.
. 6. Research at the University of Texas showed that male fetuses of mothers
exposed to DNA-damaging agents such as radiation are at risk for
developing testicular cancer: "Fetal Exposure to Radiation Increases
Risk |