Dr. George Carlo, epidemiologist who headed the Wireless Technology Research (WTR) program in the 1990s: "Normally a device such as a mobile phone or cell phone
that is a consumer device that emits radiation would go through a
process of pre-market testing...done prior to marketing so that
predictions of risk to the population that might use them could be made.
However, cell phones were exempted from that based on the input from the mobile phone industry in 1984. That input was based on science ...at
that time that indicated that the only health effect that could follow
from microwave exposure had to do with heating of biological tissue, and
that because cell
phones operated at very, very low power they would not be able to heat
tissue and therefore they should be excluded from this onerous process of pre-market testing. That was known as the low-power exclusion." *
Mary Holland, research scholar at the NYU School of Law: "Since World War II, the international community has recognized the grave dangers in involuntary scientific and medical experimentation on human subjects. In the aftermath of Nazi medical atrocities, the world affirmed the Nuremberg Code which states that the voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential....It applies everywhere, whether or not a country has specific laws on its books, as customary norms now prohibit slavery, genocide, torture and piracy." **
How Wireless Technologies Violate the Nuremberg Code
Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy:
“To carry out compulsory mass exposure to pulsed microwave radiation,
without the fully informed consent of the people affected,
is in contravention of the Nuremberg Code.”
All wireless devices and RF/microwave propagating systems, including Wi-Fi and Bluetooth, are strictly experimental in regards to biological effects on humans. There are NO studies proving safety while thousands of peer-reviewed studies demonstrate evidence of harm. In order to deflect these facts, the Wi-mafia brazenly prevaricates that, despite thousands of published studies to the contrary, there is "no evidence of harm."
Americans and Canadians are uninformed human test subjects involuntarily enrolled in a radical and experimental reconfiguration of the earth's electromagnetic environment. The entire biosphere is now pulsating with manmade RF/microwave radiation used for wireless communications, entertainment, surveillance and medical device applications. (This is in addition to military radar, as well as radiation systems used for weather modification and weapons.)
Dangerous, multi-frequency experimentation specifically violates all ten mandates of the Nuremberg Code, a set of ethics approved by many nations after World War II. This code was constructed as a deterrent against the horrific human experimentation perpetrated by Nazi war criminals before and during the war. Here are the ten points of the Nuremberg Code:
1. Required is the voluntary and well-informed consent of human test subjects in a full legal capacity.
Informed consent is impossible without full disclosure of the latest scientific information regarding possible adverse effects from RF/microwave products, devices and services. An
example of full disclosure is the list of adverse effects and warnings inserted into the packaging of pharmaceutical drugs. The vested interests which authorize and profit from the propagation of experimental, pulsed wireless radiations across all public venues, have
provided American test subjects with ZERO information on the documented biological hazards of the products, devices and environmental antennas which disseminate these radiations.
2. The experiment should aim at positive results for society that cannot be procured in some other way.
The benefits of wireless communications products and services, which expose the public to experimental, pulsed megahertz and terahertz radiation, can be procured in safer ways. Phone service is possible through both private and public landline applications. With concerted effort, landline services could be made convenient for everyone, everywhere. Excellent Internet
connectivity can be provided by fiber optic cable and hardwired Ethernet systems, even in public places. Adequate airport surveillance can be conducted through a variety of non-radiation modalities. Therefore, as with smoking, the use of radiation-intensive wireless technologies
should be confined to only designated areas for those who give informed consent to be irradiated with experimental, pulsed electromagnetic frequencies.
3. The experiment should be based on previous knowledge (like an expectation derived
from animal experiments) that justifies the experiment.
There is now enough medical documentation to indicate that there is no justification for universal RF and microwave experimentation, since thousands of published RF/microwave studies on both humans and animals indicate that the expectations from such exposure include: disease, disability, genetic deformity and premature death.
4. The experiment should be set up in a way that avoids unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injuries.
Medical science indicates that the only way to avoid unnecessary physical and mental suffering inherent in RF/microwave radiation experimentation is to STOP THE EXPERIMENT NOW! Mankind should dedicate time and resources to replacing radiation-intensive technologies with safer technologies, proven to be biologically and genetically safe.
5. The experiment should not be conducted when there is any reason to believe that it implies a risk of death or disabling injury.
By the year 2000, the ECOLOG Institute in Hanover, Germany, had compiled over 200 peer-reviewed and published medical studies finding strong indications for the cancer-initiating and cancer-promoting effects of the high frequency electromagnetic fields used for wireless radiation technologies. Many additional studies have been published since the year 2000. Because there is sufficient, peer-reviewed documentation and much clinical evidence that wireless technology experimentation implies risk of death or disabling injury, all RF/microwave experimentation should be discontinued NOW.
6. The risks of the experiment should be in proportion to (that is, not exceed) the expected humanitarian benefits.
The
proven biological damage from RF/microwave radiation far exceeds the "humanitarian benefits" of universal wireless
connectivity provided, for example, to gamers and loafers who demand instant mobile
entertainment anytime, anywhere, regardless of how the radiation affects others and regardless of how it impacts the entire biosphere.
7. Preparations and facilities must be provided that adequately protect the subjects against the experiment’s risks.
The only possible way to protect human subjects against the biological risks of today's experimental wireless radiation is to ensure that all
public buildings and all public outdoor arenas are kept FREE of this dangerous radiation. Period.
8. The staff who conduct or take part in the experiment must be fully trained and scientifically qualified.
The
"staff" which administers experimental wireless RF/microwave radiation to American test subjects are FCC regulators, radiation engineers and wireless technology peddlers who ignore the thousands of published studies confirming the dangerous biological effects of the environmental radiation
which they authorize, sell and disseminate. None of these profiteers are medically or scientifically qualified to
administer to an entire population ubiquitous and experimental modulations of non-ionizing
energy with the same potential to sicken and kill as ionizing radiation (X-ray, gamma waves).
9.
The human subjects must be free to immediately quit the experiment at
any point when they feel physically or mentally unable to go on.
American test subjects
are currently not free to escape the nationwide wireless radiation experiment, unless they
hide in a sheltered cave. The untold thousands of people who are immediately sickened
by gigahertz exposure (an estimated 3-10% of the US population with
electrohypersensitivity) cannot immediately "quit" this compulsory, nationwide experiment
because wave carcinogen is recklessly propagated everywhere, without official oversight, including all essential areas of public accommodation
such as airports, schools, hospitals, elder care centers and grocery stores.
10. Likewise, the medical staff must stop the experiment at any point when they observe that continuation would be dangerous.
There
is no medical staff involved in the nationwide RF/microwave wireless experiment. Under
Nuremberg Code constrictions, all non-medical perpetrators should be required to withdraw their
dangerous wireless technologies immediately, until qualified medical staff
can complete well-constructed, clinical and epidemiological studies on all of the modulation techniques and frequencies being inflicted upon the general population. Before any RF/microwave device is placed on the consumer market, it should be certified by independent scientists as biologically safe for all humans, regardless of age and health status (newborns, elderly, immune compromised, etc.) Likewise, before any frequency, power density or modulation is propagated by antennas into public spaces, it should be certified as biologically safe for all humans, regardless of age and health status (newborns, elderly, immune compromised, etc).
Summation The great wireless experiment has been underway in the USA for over three decades. It is now culminating in the great 5G/6G revolution. People who are injured or who die as a result of this mass experimentation are doing so without official and medical acknowledgement that chronic radiation exposure is a foremost contributing factor to their personal health disasters. Considering massive scientific documentation of the potent carcinogenicity of wireless radiation, technologies that propagate experimental and compulsory RF/microwaves and millimeter waves into the human environment are a re-play of horrific German Nazi medical experimentation.
* Dr. Carlo
made this statement in 2007 during a presentation to the people of
Jersey regarding the medical hazards of microwave radiation. Find Dr.
Carlo's excellent presentation HERE.
** Holland's statement was included in her presentation to the United Nations 25th International Health and Environment Conference April 26, 2016.
|