|
Notes
1. What is Cancer?" American Cancer Society, www.cancer.org.
2. "Defining Cancer," National Cancer Institute, www.cancer.gov.
3. The REFLEX project was set up by the European Union to investigate
the effects of low-level RF/microwave radiation used for wireless
technologies. At a cost of three million dollars, the work was carried
out by 12 research groups in seven European nations and completed in
2004. See: Report
of the European Union's REFLEX Project (Risk Evaluation of Potential
Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure
Using Sensitive in vitro Methods), November 2004. An in-depth report on the REFLEX project can be found in the on-line brochure Health and Electromagnetic Fields: EU-funded research into the Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields and Mobile Phones on Health published by the European Commission, 02-29-2008.
4. Dr. Martin Pall speaking to an audience in Ashland Massachusetts, 08-14-2017. LINK
5. "Microwave Emissions From Cell Phone Exceed Safety Limits in Europe and U.S. When Touching the Body," Gandhi et al., Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Utah, IEEE Access, 03-12-20-19.
6. Dr. Devra Davis, a world-renown scientist, makes this statement in her letter to the Baltimore Sun, March 12, 2017.
7. "Millennial Selfies: Young Adults Will Take More than 25,000 Pictures of Themselves During Their Lifetimes," IBtimes.com, 09-22-2019.
8. From the newsletter of the Associated BioElectromagnetics Technologists of April 2004: “The
cell phone headset has become popular as a way to reduce the cognitive
impairment and cancer risk associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation
exposure. However, the possibility of embryonic and fetal damage is now
increasing as the radiating cell phone units are being moved elsewhere
on or near the body. In many cases the devices are relocated immediately
adjacent to the area where an embryo or fetus is carried. Researchers
have emphatically reported that an embryo/fetus should not be exposed to
radiofrequency radiation, such as that emitted by the portable cell
phone or portable telephone. One particular reason to avoid RF
radiation exposure during pregnancy is that an embryo/fetus may not be
fully protected by amniotic fluid for extended periods of time due to
the natural movement of the mother or the embryo/fetus within the womb.
Secondly, the pelvic structure promotes deep RF radiation penetration
and that radiation can be absorbed within the developing embryo/fetus.”
9. “Generation X'd Out: An End to the Human Race as We've Known It?”
Worthington, Idaho Observer, Jan/Feb 2009. This research paper
documents the horrific known effects of Wi-radiation on human
reproduction. In June 2012, the EMF Safety Network published a
bibliography of
312 studies documenting the wide array of effects of electromagnetic
fields on mammalian fertility and reproduction. Also: "Survey of Childhood Malignancies," Stewart, et al., British Medical Journal
(1958), p. 1495. Also: "Radiation Dose Effects in Relation to
Obstetrics, X Ray and Childhood Cancer," Alice Stewart and George W.
Kneale, Lancet 1 (1970): 1185-1187. Also: "Prenatal X-ray Exposure and Childhood Cancer," Brian MacMahon, Journal of the National Cancer Institute 28 (1962): 1173.
10. "Risk Assessment of Chronic Exposures To Non-Thermal Microwaves from
Mobile Communication," Igor Belyaev, Slovak Academy of Sciences,
05-13-2014.
11. Research at the University of Texas showed that male fetuses of mothers
exposed to DNA-damaging agents such as radiation are at risk for
developing testicular cancer: "Fetal Exposure to Radiation Increases
Risk of Testicular Cancer," University of Texas, MD. Anderson Cancer
Center, 02-13-2012.
12. Russian National Committee on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (RNCNIRP): Children and Mobile Phones: The Health of the Following Generations is in Danger, Moscow, Russia, April 2008. A follow-up resolution was issued in April 2011.
13. See
also: "NTP Studies--Experts Recommend Elevated Conclusions," National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, April 2018.
14. Ibid.
15. See EVIDENCE FOR CANCER at this website: LINK
16. “There is Currently Enough Evidence and Technology Available to
Warrant Taking Immediate Steps to Reduce Exposure of Consumers to Cell
Phone-related Electromagnetic Radiation,” Khurana et al., Med Phys.
2008 Dec; 35(12):5203-6. The medical team that produced this report is
affiliated with the Canberra Hospital, Australian National University
Medical School.
17. "High Frequency Radiation at Stockholm Old Town: An Exposimeter Study," Hardell et al., Molecular and Clinical Oncology, April 2017 6(4:462-476).
18. "Data Indicates Cell Phones Expose Consumers to Radiation Levels Higher
Than Manufacturers Claim, Says the French Government," Natural Health News, 06-20-2017. LINK Read more about the French compliance testing (PhoneGate) HERE
19. NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenicity Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation,
National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health
Sciences, June 8, 2016. BioEM2016 Meeting, Ghent, Belgium.
20. "Effects of Electromagnetic Fields on Glands and its Relationship with
Diabetes," Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy, Scientific Advisor to ES UK, 2012.
21. "Dirty Electricity and Electrical Hypersensitivity: Five Case
Studies," Havas et al., Environmental & Resource Studies, Trent
University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada. 2006; See also: "Dirty
Electricity Elevates Blood Sugar Among Electrically Sensitive Diabetics
and May Explain Brittle Diabetes," Havas et al., Electromagnetic Biology Medicine, 2008; 27(2):135-46.
22. "Effects of Olive Leaf Extract on Metabolic Disorders and Oxidative Stress Induced by 2.45 GHz Wi-Fi Signals," M. Salah et al., Experimental Toxicology and Pharmacology, Volume 36, November 2013.
23. Ibid.
24. 2011 National Diabetes Fact Sheet, Center for Disease Control, the most recent analysis by CDC available at its website.
25. "40% of Americans Will Develop Diabetes," healthydebates.com, August 2014. See also:
Relevance of Diabetes and Impaired Fasting Glucose in Adults in the
U.S. Population: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
1999–2002, Cowie et al., Diabetes Care, June, 2006; Also: "Significant Increase Diabetes Prevalence in US," C. Huggins, Reuters, 05-30-06.
26. “How Smart Meters May Cause Autism and Cancer,” Dr. Andrew Goldsworthy, MCSA News, Volume 6, Issue 8, 2011.
27. BioInitiative Report 2012, Summary for the Public, p. 4.
28.
BioInitiative Report 2012,
Section 24: “Key Scientific Evidence and Public Health Policy
Recommendations,” by Cindy Sage and David O. Carpenter, M.D., Director
of the Institute for Health and the Environment, University at
Albany. GAO's report and message to the FCC is: Telecommunications: Exposure and Testing Requirements for Mobile Phones Should be Reassessed, GAO 12-177 July 24, 2012.
29.
CTIA: The International Association for the Wireless Telecommunications
Industry “Common FAQs,” cita.org website, 2008.
30. Cellular Telephone Russian Roulette, Robert Kane, Introduction, 2001.
31. "FCC: 98 Scientific Experts Demand Stronger Regulation of Cell Phone
Radiation," PRLog, August 4, 2014. Joel Moskowitz, Ph.D., School of
Public Health, University of California, Berkeley. In the matter of 75%
of mobile phones on the market exceeding FCC emissions standards,
lawyers Swankin and Turner wrote to the FCC in September 2016, on behalf
of the Environmental Health Trust and the National Institute for
Science, Law and Public Policy, presenting this evidence.
32. Ibid.
33. “Non-Thermal Electromagnetic Radiation Damage to Lens Epithelium,” Bormusov et al., The Open Ophthalmology Journal,
2 102-106, 2008. These researchers are affiliated with the Institute
of Technology in Haifa, Israel and the Department of Ophthalmology at
Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Mo.
34. Kane, op. cit, p. 160-161:
“Reflecting objects have been shown to provide large enhancements in
the energy absorbed by human operators and also induce local “hotspots”
in the human brain. Another undesirable effect is produced with
portable cellular telephone operators who wear metal-framed
eyeglasses....A number of independent researchers have reported that
wearers of metal-framed eye glasses who use portables will suffer in
increase in absorbed radio frequency of up to 60 percent more than users
who do not....”
35. The BioInitiative Report 2012, Section 4:
“Concerns about the potential vulnerability of children to RF fields
have been raised because of the potentially greater susceptibility of
their developing nervous system; in addition, their brain tissue is more
conductive than that of adults since it has a higher water content and
ion concentration, RF penetration is greater relative to head size, and
they have a greater absorption of RF energy in the tissues of the head
at mobile telephone frequencies. Finally, they will have a longer
lifetime exposure.”
36.
“Radiation from Wireless Technology Affects the Blood, the Heart, and
the Autonomic Nervous System,” Magda Havas, DOI
10.1515/reveh-2013-0004, Rev Environ Health; 28(2-3): 75–84, 2013.
37.
Thanks to scientist researcher Alan Frey, medical science has known
since 1975 that low-level microwave signals, like those from Wi-devices,
cause leakage in the normally-sealed blood-brain barrier. A
comprehensive bibliography with up-to-date research documenting how
non-thermal Wi-device radiation quickly opens the blood-brain barrier
and inflicts massive brain neuron damage is available from Lund
University researchers led by top neurosurgeon Dr. Leif Salford of Sweden.
38.
“Effects of Wi-Fi Signals on the P300 Component of Event-Related
Potentials During an Auditory Hayling Task,” Papageorgiou et al., Journal of Integrative Neuroscience,
10 (2):189-202, 2011. Also: “Cognitive Impairment in Rats After
Long-term Exposure to GSM-900 Mobile Phone Radiation,” Nittby et al., Bioelectromagnetics, Volume 29, Issue 3, P. 219-232, 11-28-2007. Also: "Mobile Phone Use for 5 Minutes Can Cause Significant Memory Impairment in Humans," Kalafatakis et al., Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Sept-December 2017.
39. “Ten Reasons Why Handheld Devices Should be Banned for Children Under the Age of 12,” Huffington Post, C. Rowan, 03-06-2014. Also: “Cell Phone and Brain Tumors: 15 Reasons for Concern, Science, Spin
and the Truth Behind Interphone,” a report released by the International
EMF Collaborative, August 25, 2009.
40. Ibid.
41.
“Radiation from Wireless Technology Affects the Blood, the Heart, and
the Autonomic Nervous System,” M. Havas, DOI 10.1515/reveh-2013-0004, Rev Environ Health; 28(2-3): 75–84, 2013. See also: Broken Heart in the Wireless Age at this website.
42. “Will We All Become Electrosensitive?” Hallberg and Oberfeld, Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine 25: 189–191, 2006 Independent Research, Sweden and the Public Health Department of Salzburg, Austria.
43.
“Cell Phone Usage Damages Memory,” The Future of Things, 05-08-2009. A
study with human volunteers conducted by researchers at the Ben Gurion
University and Soreq Research Center for Nuclear Energy showed that
tasking reaction times were highly affected by cell phone usage. Also:
"Cognitive Effects of Radiation Emitted by Cellular Phones," Luria et
al., Bioelectromagnetics, April 2009; Also: “Drivers on Cell
Phones are as Bad as Drunks,” University of Utah (Unews) 06-29-2006.
This article outlines a number of University of Utah studies showing
that drivers using microwave devices suffer severe impairment of their
motor skills, including reaction time. Clearly, there is more to this
impairment than simple distraction, since microwave devices always
induce long-lasting, abnormal EEG signals in the human brain.
44.
Cindy Sage was interviewed on the dangers of Wi-radiation in medical
settings by Patricia J. Rullo at Speak Up and Stay Alive Radio, July 24,
2014. LISTEN TO THE SAGE INTERVIEW
45. Naval Medical Research Report, June 1971, Bibliography
of Reported Biological Phenomena (Effects) and Clinical Manifestations
Attributed to Microwave and Radio-Frequency Radiation, Report No. 2 Revised, 1972.
46. "When Doctors Struggle With Suicide, Their Profession Often Fails Them," NationalPublicRadio.org, 07-31-2018.
47. "Suicide in Nursing: Much More Common Than You Think," nurse.org, 09-28-2017.
48. "Passive Exposure to Mobile Phones: Enhancement of Intensity by Reflection," Hondou et al., Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, 2002. This study was published in the Journal of the Japanese Physical Society of Japan, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 084801 (2006).
49.
Letter for airline executives from Dr. Hans Scheiner with the German
Environmental Physician Initiative, Munich, July 24, 2008.
50. Tracking and Hacking: Security and Privacy Gaps Put American Drivers at Risk, The Office of Senator Ed Markey, February 2015.
51. "Driving Safely With Automotive Radar Systems," electronicdesign.com, December 20, 2019.
52. |