2017:  Scientists writing in the European Journal of Preventative Cardiology: "Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is an environmental pollutant with cytotoxic (cell toxic) effects." [1]
2018:  Dr. Lennart Hardell, Swedish oncologist and epidemiologist renowned for his early research showing that dioxin-laced Agent Orange, used as a defoliant in the Vietnam War, is grossly carcinogenic to humans: "Based on the IARC preamble to the monographs, radiofrequency radiation should be classified as Group 1: The agent is carcinogenic to humans." [2]
2018:  Writer Sarah Codosh, talking jive in Popular Science Magazine: "And there is no evidence that cell phones are dangerous to your health. Period....So go ahead and leave your phone in your pocket. Talk on it for hours. Heck, you could duct-tape it to your face if you choose.  [It's safe because I say so]." [3]
Evidence That RFR/Microwave Radiation
Used For Wireless Technologies is a
Confirmed Human Carcinogen!
The latest RFR data from leading scientists:
 "Increased risk of brain, vestibular nerve [acoustic neuroma tumor inner ear/brain] and salivary gland tumors are associated with mobile phone use."
 Nine studies (2011–2017) report increased risk of brain cancer from mobile phone use
Four case-control studies (3 in 2013, 1 in 2014) report increased risk of vestibular nerve tumors
Concern for other cancers: breast (male & female), testis, leukemia and thyroid
   "Based on the evidence reviewed it is our opinion that IARC's
                current categorization of RFR as a possible human carcinogen (Group 2B)                    
should be upgraded to Carcinogenic to Humans (Group 1)."
 Microwave cancer studies in chronological order:
Guy Air Force Study at University of Washington Medical School (1980-1982) [4]

This research, documented in nine technical reports, evaluated rats with full-body exposure to 2.45 gigahertz (2450 megahertz), the main frequency used today for omnipresent Wi-Fi technologies. The animals were exposed to one half the federally-approved, maximum environmental human exposure allowable. Their average absorption rate (SAR) was 0.4W/kg, certified by the FCC as "safe" for humans. In addition to a statistically significant incidence of malignant tumors, the exposed rats suffered disastrous effects to their adrenal glands and to their entire endocrine system, including development of endocrine tumors. (Can we wonder why so many microwaved Americans suffer from adrenal exhaustion, thyroid malfunction, obesity and endocrine tumors?)  LINK


By 1993, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) produced a memo which stated that animal studies strongly suggest that microwaves can "accelerate the development of cancer." Top FDA officials wrote: "Of eight chronic animal experiments known to us, five resulted in increased numbers of malignancies, accelerated progression of tumors, or both." [5]  LINK
  EMF Paper by the Hardell Group in Sweden (1995)  [6]

A team of cancer researchers at Orebro Hospital in Orebro, Sweden, reviewed epidemiological and experimental studies on the bioeffects of extremely low electromagnetic (ELF) fields published up to 1994. They found that these studies confirmed an increased risk of leukemia in children exposed to power lines; an increased risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia from ELF exposure; also an increased risk of breast cancer, malignant melanoma of the skin, nervous system tumors, acute myeloid leukemia, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and acute lymphocytic leukemia from occupational exposure to these fields. Today's wireless antennas propagate a great variety of ELF modulation frequencies which are superimposed upon the carrier microwaves LINK

 Australian Lymphoma Study (1997) [7]
Australian researchers exposed lymphoma-susceptible mice to pulsed 900 megahertz radiation for up to 18 months, with twice-daily exposures at 30 minutes each. The signals were devised to mimic cell GSM phone radiation, but the mice received far-field exposure, as compared to the near field of cell phone radiation that directly enters human brains. At the end of the experiment, 43% of exposed mice had developed lymphoma compared to 22% of non-irradiated controls. The exposed mice also suffered accelerated development of cancer compared to controls. Scientists conducting the study called the increased incidence of lymphoma in irradiated animals "highly significant" and they stated that it is unlikely that accelerated cancer growth in microwaved animals was due to chance. Lead researcher, Dr. Michael Rapacholi, told Microwave News: "I believe this is the first animal study showing a true non-thermal effect."  LINK
By 2000, European researchers with the ECOLOG Institute in Germany had amassed over 220 peer-reviewed and published scientific papers containing strong indications for cancer-initiating and cancer-promoting effects of the RF/microwave radiation that now saturates our environment to accommodate wireless technologies. This impressive scientific collection was organized and published at the turn of this century in a document titled Mobile Telecommunications and Health. Actually funded by giants of the telecom industry, the ECOLOG study organized a massive collection of early scientific information on the devastating cellular, hormonal, immunological, neurological and reproductive damage inflicted by pulsed, high-frequency electromagnetic fields. This collection demonstrates that governments and industry profiteers knew decades ago that the unleashing of unlimited RF/microwave pollution --even at very low power densities-- has potential to make humanity very sick indeed[8]  LINK

 Case-control Study by the Hardell Group in Sweden (2002)  [9]

Nordic countries were among the first in the world to adopt wireless telecommunications technologies. NMT analog mobile phones came into use in 1981, exposing Nordic populations to 450 and 900 megahertz microwave radiation. By 1991, GSM digital wireless was operational at 900 megahertz and 1.9 gigahertz. Responding to reports of brain cancers in wireless phone users, the Hardell team working at Orebro Hospital in Orebro, Sweden, initiated a case-control study of 233 Swedish brain cancer victims diagnosed between 1994 to 1996.  This study produced the first indications of increased risk for malignancies in those who had used wireless NMT phones. The researchers concluded: “Ipsilateral (same side) use of a cellular telephone increased the risk of tumors in the temporal, temporoparietal and occipital areas…the anatomical areas with highest exposure to microwaves from a mobile phone.” LINK

Case-control Study by the Hardell Group in Sweden (2003)  [10]

On to something big, the Hardell Group conducted a case-control study of 1,617 brain tumor patients diagnosed between 1997-2000. These numbers showed that the risk for high-grade astrocytoma brain cancer was significantly increased with ipsilateral (same side) use of analogue mobile phones, digital mobile phones and also cordless landline phones. The odds ratio was highest for development of microwave-induced acoustic neuroma (AN), a usually benign but dangerous tumor that grows on the nerve between the ear and the brain, causing hearing loss and neurological difficulties. AN treatment requires surgery and other risky, invasive procedures.  LINK

Astrocytomas are the most common primary tumors of the central nervous system. Astrocytomas develop from small, star-shaped cells called astrocytes, and may arise anywhere in the brain or spinal cord.  Grade IV astrocytomas are called glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), considered to be the most horrific and incurable type of brain tumor. Glioblastomas and anaplastic astrocytomas, accounting for more than 50 percent of all astrocytomas, grow rapidly and spread aggressively. The average lifespan after diagnosis is about 400 days (most of which, reportedly, aren't worth a darn). Brain cancers are often discovered in the final stages, partly because of stealth proteins used by tumors in early malignancy to evade the body's alarm systems.
European Union REFLEX Studies (2004) [11]

Scientists from ten EU nations showed that cell phone microwaves propagated at 1.8 gigahertz induce severe damage in human blood cells identical to that produced by ionizing nuclear radiation. A mere 24 hours of continuous microwave radiation at this frequency produced cell damage equivalent to 2400 chest X-rays. This frequency is within the gigahertz spectrum realm of 2G, 3G and 4G wireless phone radiation.  LINK

Italian Study on Human Leukemia Cells (2004) [12]
Italian scientists published results of a laboratory study which exposed human leukemia cells to radio waves at 900 MHz, the same frequency band used for GSM cell phone technology and smart utility meters. The radiation initially killed some of the malignant cells. But after 48 hours, the microwaves activated three types of genes known to induce cancer cells to multiply. The surviving leukemia cells then began to divide aggressively due to activation of pro-survival signals critical for tumor progression and metastasis [spreading] of cancer. The study report concludes, "Our data strongly support the hypothesis that high-frequency EMFs exposure leads cancer cells to acquire a greater survival chance, a phenomenon linked to tumor aggressiveness." Here scientists induced human leukemia cells to activate ferociously at a SAR of only 3.5 mW/kg while the FCC allows wireless devices to excrete 1600 mW/kg [1.6 W/kg] directly into human brains!  LINK
     Case-control Combined Studies By the Hardell Group in Sweden (2006) [13]

The Hardell Group evaluated statistics from two new case-control studies of brain cancer victims diagnosed between 1997-2000. Combined, these studies yielded information on 905 patients. Once again the numbers showed increased risk for high-grade astrocytoma brain cancer in those who used digital cell phones and/or cordless phones. This study demonstrated a high risk of cancer for victims who had begun using microwave phones before the age of twenty. This research also determined that cancer risk was highest for people who had used wireless phones for 10 years or more.  LINK

 Researchers Report Epidemiological Evidence for Cell Tower Cancer (2010) [14]
Six internationally renowned researchers organized numerous epidemiological studies showing that people living and working within 1600 feet of RF/microwave antennas eventually suffer serious health problems. Published in the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, this report says: “Human populations are increasingly exposed to microwave/radiofrequency (RF) emissions from wireless communication technology, including mobile phones and their base stations. By searching PubMed…we found that eight of the ten studies reported increased prevalence of adverse neurobehavioral symptoms or cancer in populations living at distances less than 500 meters from base stations….None of the studies reported exposures above accepted international guidelines, suggesting that current guidelines may be inadequate in protecting the health of human populations….At exposure levels far below international guidance levels there are clear and consistent signs of adverse health effects in the general population….”  LINK
Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies/Malignant Brain Tumors by Hardell  (2011) [15]
The Hardell Group further analyzed two case-control studies involving 1251 brain tumor victims, alive and deceased, who had been diagnosed during 1997-2003.  This study again confirmed that risk for high-grade astrocytoma brain cancer increases with latency period and cumulative hours of exposure to both cellular and cordless phones. Once again the numbers showed increased risk for those who used microwave phones for over ten years. This study also reconfirmed an extremely high risk for those who had begun the use of microwave phones before the age of 20.  This group charted out at an odds ratio of 4.9. An odds ratio of 1 means no risk, an odds ratio of 4.9 means nearly five time the risk for brain cancer as found in the control group. LINK

The 13-Nation Interphone Study (2011) [16]

The Interphone Study was designed as a global, case-control inquiry on the link between mobile phones/cordless phones and various cancers.  The research was conducted in 13 countries using a common protocol. The pooled results showed an increase in risk for glioma brain cancer and acoustic neuroma among microwave phone users, but directors of the study worried that recall bias and error may have prevented a causal interpretation.  In 2011, Cardis et al., published an overview of five of the countries in the study and stated that "there were increased odds ratios for tumors in the most exposed parts of the brain in those with 10+ years of mobile phone use....There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma in long term mobile phone users with high RF exposure and of similar, but apparently much smaller increases in meningioma [brain tumor] risk."  Cardis called for replication studies. 
The Hardell Group followed Interphone with a published paper explaining that while Interphone data confirmed earlier Hardell findings of cancer risk in wireless phone users between the ages of 29-59 years, Interphone researchers in several countries had excluded the age group 20-29 years Because this age group was shown by Hardell to have a comparatively high brain cancer risk, especially among those who started using microwave phones before the age of twenty, Hardell noted that exclusion of this high-risk group had skewed Interphone statistics and conclusions.   LINK
 Association Between US Brain Tumor Incidence and Cell Phone Contracts (2011) [17]
A team of researchers at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York published a study in the Journal of Neuro-Oncology showing a significant correlation between a vast assortment of human brain tumors and the number of cell phone contracts in nineteen U.S. States. This study says: "The very linear relationship between cell phone usage and brain tumor incidence is disturbing and certainly needs further epidemiological evaluation. In the meantime, it would certainly be prudent to limit exposure to all sources of electromagnetic radiation." LINK
  RF Cancer Designation By International Agency for Research on Cancer  (2011) [18]
In May 2011, a working group composed of 31 experts on electromagnetic field (EMF) radiation, convened by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) of the World Health Association (WHO), reported on the results of an extensive review of the health effects research. The committee concluded that radiofrequency radiation is a Group 2B carcinogen and therefore possibly cancer-causing in humans.  In arriving at this conclusion, the working group relied heavily on results of the Interphone  Study, a 13-nation study sponsored by the WHO, and a series of studies conducted by Dr. Lennart Hardell in Sweden.    Leading experts, including the Hardell Group, insist that the IARC designation must now be updated to reflect additional scientific evidence for cancer which has accumulated since 2011.
 Acoustic Neuroma Update from Hardell (2013) [19]
The Hardell Group made a further study of Swedes diagnosed with acoustic neuroma between the years 1997-2003 and 2007-2009. This pooled analysis of two case-control studies once again confirmed an association between the use of mobile phones and acoustic neuroma tumors of the inner ear/brain.  LINK
 Hardell  Confirmation That Glioma Brain Cancer and Acoustic Neuroma
Are Initiated and Promoted by Wireless Microwave Radiation (2013) [20]
The Hardell Group evaluated all nine issues on causation listed by the Bradford Hill criteria, a protocol endorsed by modern medicine as a framework for determining cause and effect.  Hardell determined that based on Bradford Hill criteria, glioma and acoustic neuroma should be considered to be caused by RF-EMF emissions from wireless phones. This paper states that wireless device emissions are rightly regarded as carcinogenic to humans and should be designated as Group 1A according to the IARC classification.  It also confirms that current international guidelines for public exposure to this radiation urgently need to be revised.  LINK
 Multi-Focal Breast Cancer Study by California Doctors (2013) [21]
In late 2013, six medical experts, representing five prestigious California medical establishments, published a paper on young women who developed invasive breast cancer after prolonged exposure to their cell phones: “We report a case series of four young women --ages from 21 to 39-- with multi-focal invasive breast cancer that raises the concern of a possible association with non-ionizing radiation of electromagnetic field exposures from cellular phones. Pathology of all four cases show striking similarity. These cases raise awareness to the lack of safety data of prolonged direct contact with cellular phones. All patients regularly carried their smart phones directly against their breasts, in their brassieres for up to 10 hours a day, for several years, and developed tumors in areas of their breasts immediately underlying the phones...." LINK
   Hardell Review of Decreased Survival of Brain Cancer Patients (2014) [22]
Using data from their 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 case-control studies of brain tumor patients, the Hardell group analyzed the impact of wireless phones on the survival rates of 1678 glioma sufferers. This study yielded evidence of decreased survival in Grade IV astrocytoma patients commensurate with their years of wireless phone use. The highest decrease in survival rate was found in cases who began use of mobile phones before the age of twenty. These researchers concluded: "Due to the relationship with survival, the classification of IARC is strengthened and RF-EMF should be regarded as a human carcinogen requiring urgent revision of current exposure guidelines." LINK
 The French National CERENAT Study (2014) [23]

This human case-control study conducted in populations across France found a significant rate of glioma and meningioma brain tumors in the heaviest users of mobile phones.  LINK

The German Study from Jacobs University (2015) [24]
Nine scientists at Jacobs University in Bremen, Germany, published state-of-the-art studies showing that animals exposed to 0.4 down to .04 watts per kilogram [SAR exposure levels 4 to 40 times lower than the 1.6 W/Kg allowed for human brain exposure by U.S. federal guidelines] suffered a significantly higher incidence (than non-irradiated animals) of lung cancer, liver cancer and lymphoma cancer. This research is especially important because it is a replication of an earlier (2010) animal study which had basically produced the same results.  LINK


The US National Toxicology Program (NTP) Studies (2016) [25]

Animal studies are considered valid for assessing cancer risk in humans. This federally-funded group of studies, conducted under auspices of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), induced cancer, pre-cancer hyperplasia and DNA damage in a significant percentage of test rats exposed to cell phone microwaves: GSM- or CDMA-modulated at 900 megahertz. This study produced "clear evidence" that cell phone radiation produces statistically significant brain and heart schwannoma cancers in rats exposed to this radiation, even at power densities below federal exposure guidelines. LINK Additionally, "equivocal evidence" of cancer risk was reported in the pituitary, adrenal and prostate glands and pancreas and liver in male rats and adrenal glands in female rats. NTP scientists also irradiated test mice with modulated 1.9 gigahertz microwaves widely used in wireless technologies. "Equivocal evidence of cancer risk from cell phone radiation was reported for lymphoma in male and female mice. Equivocal evidence was also reported for skin, lung and liver cancer in male mice."  LINK

 Saudi Arabian Study Showing iPhone Correlation to Salivary Gland Cancer (2016) [26]
This human case-control study reported a significant increase of 11+ fold for parotid gland cancers in Apple iPhone users when the phone was used for more than one hour per day. LINK

 Canadian Update on Human Brain Cancer Risk (2017) [27]

A medical team involved with the original Interphone Study completed a re-evaluation of Canadian Interphone data. Using a probabilistic, multiple-bias model, this team confirmed a significant risk of glioma brain tumors among Canadian wireless users interviewed for the study.  Canada currently has a horrific overall national cancer rate: one in two Canadians will suffer some type of cancer in their lifetime.   LINK
 Hardell  Evaluation of Cancer Risk from Bradford Hill Viewpoints (2017) [28]
Tying together the latest global research, the Hardell Group published a detailed analysis of the many ways that mobile phone and cordless phone radiation fulfills Bradford Hill criteria on association and causation of disease. This paper lists the following crucial Hill points:
Strength [of data]: meta-analysis of case-control studies gives odds ratio (OR) = 1.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.31–2.76 with highest cumulative exposure. Consistency: the risk increases with latency, meta-analysis gave in the 10+ years' latency group OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.20–2.19. Specificity: increased risk for glioma is in the temporal lobe. Using meningioma cases as comparison group still increases the risk. Temporality: highest risk is in the 20+ years' latency group, OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.41–2.88, for wireless phones. Biological gradient: cumulative use of wireless phones increases the risk. Plausibility: animal studies show an increased incidence of glioma and malignant schwannoma in rats exposed to radiofrequency (RF) radiation. There is increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from RF radiation. Coherence: there is a change in the natural history of glioma and increasing incidence. Experiment: antioxidants reduce ROS production from RF radiation. Analogy: there is an increased risk in subjects exposed to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields.
"Conclusion: RF radiation should be regarded as a human carcinogen causing glioma." LINK
 The Italian Ramazzini Study (2018) [29]
The Ramazzini Institute in Italy has published results of its large study in which animals were abused with exposure to 1.8 gigahertz representative of cell tower antenna emissions. This study reports a significant number of Schwann cell tumors (schwannomas) in exposed animals, compared to controls and therefore it strongly supports the findings of the NTP studies. Schwann cells are found in most organs of the body, both human and animal. Schwann cells play a key role in the nervous system where they form the myelin sheath and help conduct electrical impulses. The researchers who completed this study are among the many experts demanding that IARC update its radiofrequency designation commensurate with the documented potential of microwaves to induce and accelerate cancer in animals and humans. LINK
We must not hold our breath for a proper IARC update any time soon!  Dr. Lennart Hardell explains that the majority of the current Core Group members in charge of releasing RF health information for the World Health Organization are now downplaying the documented cancer risks of wireless radiation because they are affiliated with the infamous International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) and thus have a serious conflict of interest. ICNIRP is an industry-loyal NGO and it remains committed to outdated and deadly wireless radiation exposure standards that plague the world today.  LINK
 Yale University Study of Thyroid Cancer in Cell Phone Users (2018) [30]

Thyroid cancer is currently exploding in the USA and many other nations across the world. Researchers at the Yale School of Medicine, working with the Connecticut Health Department, stumbled upon a correlation between cell phone radiation and microcarcinoma of the thyroid gland. A study of thyroid cancer victims and a control population of non-users was conducted in Connecticut during the years 2010 and 2011 with results published in 2018. The study showed that men who used cell phones for more than 15 years had twice the risk for thyroid cancer than non-users. Women who used cell phones more than two hours per day had a 52% greater risk for thyroid cancer than non-users. The researchers denied "significant association" but they stated that "suggestive elevated risk of thyroid microcarcinoma associated with long-term and more frequent [cell phone] uses warrants further investigation." This study is the tip of the iceberg since it used a very small sample size, especially for males. It did not factor in microwave cordless phone use, ignoring a high risk factor. Cell phone users in the study were not exposed to today's smart phones with multiple antennas situated at the bottom where they spew carcinogenic microwaves directly into the jaw and neck areas. Urgently needed are properly-designed follow-up studies to confirm microwave damage to thyroid tissues as documented in numerous earlier studies showing:  DNA damage, oxidative stress and reduction of thyroid hormone secretion.  LINK
The Israeli HL Cancer Studies (2018) [31]
Researchers with the Hebrew University in Israel published a study of radiation-related human cancers produced in occupational and military settings. They focused on the extraordinary number of hemolymphatic (HL) cancers produced by communication and radar microwave frequencies. HL cancers arise from blood cells or lymphoid tissues involving the liver. This study is germane to our current Microwave Age with its new vehicle radar driver assist systems, DOT's upcoming vehicle-to-vehicle radar project and the myriad radar antennas deployed by driverless (autonomous) vehicles. This research analyzed published data from a group of cancer patients with a history of prolonged exposure to radiofrequency radiation, including radar microwaves, plus three additional cohort studies of heavily irradiated military and industrial workers in various countries. These groups all suffered high HL cancer rates. The Israeli scientists state in their abstract: "Overall, the epidemiological studies on the excess risk for HL and other cancers, together with brain tumors in cell phone users and experimental studies on RFR and carcinogenicity make a coherent case for a cause-effect relationship and classifying RFR exposure as a human carcinogen (IARC Group 1A)." LINK

 Yet, We Are Still in the Information Dark Ages!

    The above-listed documentation provides clear evidence that microwave radiation used for wireless technologies is what the Hardell Group calls "a multi-site carcinogen." [32] A multi-site carcinogen can cause cancer anywhere in the body. But most of the scientific evidence for microwave causation of malignancy in man and beast has been gathered mainly from the older wireless technologies, that is: NMT, 2G, 3G and older radar installations.
    There is little data on the real-life carcinogenicity of unregulated Wi-Fi channel frequencies  (2.45 to 6 gigahertz delivered non-stop to most people wherever they go. Nor do we have adequate research on the newer 4G/LTE and 4G/WiMax antenna frequencies now saturating the nation: 600 to 850 megahertz and 1.7 to 2.6 gigahertz With the advent of smart phones and tablets, human exposure has been greatly amplified compared to earlier human exposures. Smart personal devices feature multiple antennas which simultaneously beam differing carrier frequencies along with their diverse modulation signals, all doing their own vibrational "thing."
     Millions of device-worshippers stream MIMO 4G (multiple signals) into their flesh for hours each day, then tuck it under their heads at night. Workers and students now use connected microwave devices hundreds of hours per month, thousands of hours per year, not counting the time they carry those devices directly on their bodies. Worse yet, many begin this intensive microwave abuse in infancy. A recent survey by child development experts revealed that the vast majority of U.S. children under age four play with wireless devices by themselves and that most babies are familiar with parental devices before they reach the age of one. [32]

 None of the above studies fully address the current excessive exposure levels
that most people take for granted.
Most enlightening would be lab studies of human flesh (Wi-industry CEOs)
infused with the real-life aggregate assault of:
(1) environmental Wi-Fi, indoors and out
(2) GSM and 3G cellular radiation
 (3) 4G beam-forming MIMO radiation 
 (4) Smart meter radiation
  (5) Radar radiation (24, 35, 77 gigahertz) blasting from new vehicles on the roadways
(6) GPS satellite transmissions
which are delivered in combination to most people
perpetually, year after year! 
  Such realistic studies would shed invaluable light on the ever-worsening
annual cancer statistics for both the USA and Canada.
And these authentic studies need to be done
5G millimeter wave radiation (30-100 gigahertz)
all of the above existing wireless pollution!!!!!!
 Are you getting the picture, America?
  Does this information make sense to you, Canada?
  Might it be time to back off from blind worship
of in-your-face wireless technologies?
Top mobile firms know that they sell cancer!
Click the picture below for details.

1. "Cardiovascular Disease: Time to Identify Emerging Environmental Risk Factors," Bandar et al., European Journal of Preventative Cardiology," 2017.
2.  "Comments on NTP Technical Report on the Toxicology and Carcinogenesis Studies In Hsd: Sprague Dawley SD Rats," Hardell et al., March 12, 2018.  This 26-page document was submitted to the US National Institutes of Health by the Hardell Group, Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden.
3. "There's No Evidence that Cell Phones Pose a Public Health Risk, No Matter What California Says," Popular Science, 12-19-2017.
4. "Microwaves Promote Cancer," Microwave News, July/August 1984.
5.  “Data Strongly Suggest Microwaves Can Promote Cancer,” Microwave News, February 2003. 
6. "Exposure to Extremely Low Frequency Electromagnetic Fields and the Risk of Malignant Diseases--An Evaluation of Epidemiological and Experimental Findings," Hardell et al., European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 4 Suppl 1 (Supplement):3-107 October 1995.
7.  "Digital Mobile Phone Radiation Boosts Cancer Rates in Mice,"  Microwave News, May/June 1997. 
8. Mobile Telecommunications and Health, H.E.S.E-UK, 2000. This is incredibly valuable information that documents decades of early research on the genotoxicity of RF/microwave radiation.  Ironically, this study by the ECOLOG Institute in Germany was funded by T-Mobile, a corporate giant of the Wireless Radiation Industry. READ IT HERE
9. "Ionizing Radiation, Cellular Telephones and the Risk for Brain Tumours," Hardell et al.,  European Journal of Cancer Prevention, 10 (6), January 2002.
10. "Further Aspects on Cellular and Cordless Telephones and Brain Tumors," Hardell et al., International Journal of Oncology, 10.3892/ijo.22.2.399, pages 399-407.
11. The REFLEX project was set up by the European Union to investigate the effects of low-level RF/microwave radiation used for wireless technologies. At a cost of three million dollars, the work was carried out by 12 research groups in seven European nations and completed in 2004. See: Report of the European Union's REFLEX Project (Risk Evaluation of Potential Environmental Hazards from Low Frequency Electromagnetic Field Exposure Using Sensitive in vitro Methods), November 2004. An in-depth report on the REFLEX project can be found in the on-line brochure Health and Electromagnetic Fields: EU-funded research into the Impacts of Electromagnetic Fields and Mobile Phones on Health published by the European Commission, 02-29-2008.
12. "Exposure to 900 MHz RFR at 0.0035 W/kg Affected Cell’s Self-defense Responses," Marinelli et al., J Cell Physiology. 198(2):324-332, 2004.  
13. "Pooled Analysis of Two Case-Control Studies on Use of Cellular and Cordless Telephones and the Risk for Malignant Brain Tumours Diagnosed in 1997-2003," Hardell et al., International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, Volume 79, Issue 8, pp. 630-639.
14. "Epidemiological Evidence for a Health Risk from Mobile Phone Base Stations." Int J Occup Env Health:16- 3, Jul/Sept 2010, p. 263-267.
15. "Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies on Malignant Brain Tumours and the Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones Including Living and Deceased Subjects," Hardell et al., International Journal of Oncology38(5):1465-74, February 2011.

16.  IARC Report to the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) on the Interphone Study, Dr. Christopher Wild, IARC Director, Lyon, 03 October 2011. See Also: "Re-Analysis of Risk of Glioma in Relation to Global Telephone Use: Comparison with the Results of the Interphone International Case-control Study," Hardell et al., Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, International Journal of Epidemiology, ISSN 0300-5771, 1464-3685, Vol. 40, no 4, p. 1126-1128.
17. "Association Between Number of Cell Phone Contracts and Brain Tumor Incidence in Nineteen  U.S. States,"  Lehrer et al., Journal of Neuro-Oncology, (2011) 101:505-507.
18. "Carcinogenicity of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," The Lancet, 06-22-2011. LINK
19. "Pooled Analysis of Case-Control Studies on Acoustic Neuroma Diagnosed 1997-2003 and 2007-2009 and Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones," Hardell et al., International Journal of Oncology, 43 (4) July 2013.
20. "Using the Hill Viewpoints from 1965 for Evaluating Strengths of Evidence of the Risk for Brain Tumors Associated with Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones," Hardell et al., Review of Environmental Health, 2013; 28 (2-3):97-106.
22. "Decreased Survival of Glioma Patients With Astrocytroma Grade IV (Glioblastoma Multiforme) Associated With Long-Term Use of Mobile and Cordless Phones," Hardell et al., Environmental Research and Public Health, 11 (10)10790-10805, 2014.
23.  "Mobile Phone Use and Brain Tumours in the CERENAT Case-Control Study," Coureau et al., Occupation and Environmental Medicine, 2014, July 71 (7) 514-22.

24. "Tumor Promotion by Exposure to Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields Below Exposure Limits for Humans," Lerchi et al., Biochemical and BioPhysical Research Communications, Volume 459, Issue 4, April 17, 2015.

25.  NTP Toxicology and Carcinogenicity Studies of Cell Phone Radiofrequency Radiation, National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, June 8, 2016. BioEM2016 Meeting, Ghent, Belgium.
26. "Mobile Phone Use and the Risk of Parotid Gland Tumors: A Retrospective Case-Control Study," Al-Qahtani et al., The Gulf Journal of Oncology
27. "Probabilistic Multiple-Bias Modeling Applied to the Canadian Data From the Interphone Study of Mobile Phone Use and Risk of Glioma, Meningioma, Acoustic Neuroma, and Parotid Gland Tumors," Momoli et al., American Journal of Epidemiology, 1;186 (7) 885-893, 10-01-2017.
28. "Evaluation of Mobile Phone and Cordless Phone Use and Glioma Risk Using the Bradford Hill Viewpoints from 1965 on Association and Causation," Carlberg et al., BioMedical Research International, Article ID 9218486, 03-16-2017.
29. "Report of Final Results Regarding Brain and Heart Tumors in Sprague-Dawley Rats Exposed from Prenatal Life Until Natural Death to Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Field Representative of a 1.8 GSM Base Station Environmental Emission," Falcioni et al., Environmental Research, March 2018. See also: "More Than a Coincidence," Microwave News, February 20, 2018.
30. "Cell Phone Use and the Risk of Thyroid Cancer: A Population-Based Case-Control Study in Connecticut,"  Luo et al., Annals of Epidemiology, 2018 10:004.

31.  "Radiofrequency Radiation-Related Cancer: Assessing Causation in the Occupational/Military Setting," Peleg et al., Environmental Research, Volume 163, May 2018, pp. 123-133.

32.  Exposure and Use of Mobile Media Devices by Young Children," Kabali et al., Pediatrics, December 2015, Vol. 135/ Issue 6.

Note: The above list of wireless pollutants requiring proper human health studies does not include the blizzard of numerous OTHER environmental frequencies: military transmissions, HAARP-type weather control microwaves, Doppler weather radar, aircraft radar, AM and FM radio frequencies, shortwave radio, digital television frequencies, public safety frequencies, experimental white space frequencies (used for Super Wi-Fi), HPWREN transmissions, X, Ku, Ka satellite signals, etc. There is also no data on potential bio-effects from thousands of 5G satellites slated for orbit above the earth in the near future.